14 Famous Cases Related to Article 21

Right To Life And Personal Liberty

(Article 21)

A.K Gopalan vs. the State of Madras, 1951

Hon’ble Supreme Court held that the protection of Article 21 is available only against the executive action. But legislative may deprive a person by making a law.

Maneka Gandhi vs. UOI, 1978

In this case, Hon’ble Supreme Court held that the protection of Article 21 is available not only against executive action but also against legislative.

In simple words, the legislature cannot deprive a person of the right to life and personal liberty even by making a law.

 

Scope Of Article 21

A person can only be deprived of his right to life and personal liberty by the procedure, which is established by law. For example, Death sentence while satisfying rarest of the rare case theory.

.

image2 15

The right to life does not mean only animal existence. Under this article right to life means all the aspects of life which make human life dignified.

Kharak Singh vs. the State of UP and Others

The right to privacy is included in the right to life.

Sunil Batra vs. Delhi Administration

Protection to the convicted and accused person.

In this case, the Supreme Court held that fatal cuffs are unconstitutional for a convicted person because it is an inhuman behaviour with the prisoners, and it is a violation of Article 21.

Prem Shankar Shukla vs. Delhi Administration

Hon’ble Supreme court held that handcuffing is also unconstitutional because it is violative of Article 21.

Mohini Jain vs. the State of Karnataka, 1992 SC

Supreme Court held that the right to life includes the right to education also.

Unni Krishnan vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, 1993 SC

Supreme court held the right to education is a fundamental right, as decided in Mohini Jain Case. But in such case, Hon’ble Supreme Court fixed the age that it is a fundamental right to the children for the age of 6-14 years.

In the light of two above judgements, the parliament enacted the Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.

Satwant Singh vs. APO Delhi

In this case, Hon’ble Supreme Court held that right to go abroad is a fundamental right under Article 21.

Check More Posts

Next Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Posts:

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Add New Playlist