Order VI, Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code talks about amendment of pleadings.
At any stage of proceedings, the court may allow the plaintiff or defendant to amend his pleadings. The amendment to pleadings shall be made necessary if it determines the real questions in controversy among parties.
Proviso: But if the trial has commenced, then application for amendment shall not be allowed unless the court concludes that in spite of due diligence, the matter could not have been raised before.
What is meant by Amendment of Pleadings at Any Stage of
Proceeding
The 2002 amendment inserted the phrase ‘at any stage.’ It means ‘prior to trial.‘
The party who desires to make an amendment to its pleading must raise the matter before the trial commences. After trial, the court shall not allow the party to amend unless the party qualifies the condition of due diligence laid down in proviso.
What is Due Diligence in Making Amendment
The word due diligence means reasonable care or caution, which an ordinary man must exercise as conduct in his affairs. The party must prove before the court that in spite of reasonable care and caution, it was not possible to raise the issue earlier. The party must prove that there is no intentional mistake or error on their part. The actions of the party must be bonafide.
What Amendments are Necessary
All amendments are necessary, which determines the real questions in controversy between the parties. A court before allowing amendment must consider the following points:
When Court Shall Not Allow Amendment of Pleading
It is the discretionary power of the court to allow for amendment. All the rules of procedure are the handmaids of justice. Every action of the court is to achieve the ends of justice.
Finally:
The amendments made under Order VI, Rule 17, are voluntary amendments for ratifying one’s own error or default.